Skip to content

Boat people more important than HR

October 3, 2009

Andrew Bartlett 

Crikey Blogs – Refugee priorities

The slow increase in the number of asylum seekers arriving by boat in Australian waters is creating a slowly increasing number of http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/rise-of-refugees-fleeing-war-zones/story-e6freuy9-1225781820179 antagonistic public comments and complaints.  Immigration Minister Chris Evans understandably points to the deteriorating position in parts of Afghanistan and Pakistan as a factor, as well as noting http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/steering-through-rough-seas-20091001-gejt.html a “second supply chain” from Sri Lanka.
It is an unfortunate sign of how easily our priorities and perspective can be distorted. The arrival of a few hundred Sri Lankan asylum seekers – even though those assessed as not being refugees are being returned – is seen by some as a serious problem.  Yet the Sri Lankan government continues to detain over a quarter of a million men, women and children in over-crowded, unsafe internment camps with barely a concern being voiced.  This http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/30/sri-lanka-and-its-manik-approach-to-human-rights/ piece by Jeff Sparrow notes that the silence about this situation extends to most other western countries too.  The piece also contains some descriptions from http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/sep/13/tamils-camps-sri-lanka The Guardian and elsewhere about the awful conditions in the camps and other human rights breaches.
http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2009/09/22/sri-lanka-world-leaders-should-demand-end-detention-camps  Human Rights Watch has done their usual thorough job of detailing the situation facing hundreds of thousands of displaced people.
Since March 2008, the Sri Lankan government has confined virtually everyone displaced by the war between the government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) to detention camps, depriving them of their liberty and freedom of movement in violation of international law. As of September 15, 2009, the government was holding 264,583 internally displaced persons in detention camps and hospitals, according to the UN, while fewer than 12,000 have been released or returned home.
Human Rights Watch also list specific problems such as:
Arbitrary detention and enforced disappearance;
Inability to trace missing relatives: The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), which often traces family members, has been barred from the main camps since mid-July);
Lack of protection mechanisms in the camps: The military camp administration is preventing humanitarian organizations, including the UN and the ICRC, from undertaking effective monitoring and protection in the camps;
Conditions in the camps and expected deterioration during the monsoon;
Lack of access to proper medical care
Lack of transparency and information,
But it seems the prospect of a few hundred Sri Lankans arriving in Australia by boat, some of whom are undoubtedly fleeing this situation, is a much bigger problem than the human rights abuses being inflicted on as thousand times as many people in the place they have left.
As Jeff Sparrow says in noting the minimal concern being expressed internationally:
That’s why the situation in Sri Lanka matters so much. It’s not simply because there’s something fundamentally wrong about mass collective punishment. It’s because if the world doesn’t speak out, you can expect see the model put into action elsewhere.

The slow increase in the number of asylum seekers arriving by boat in Australian waters is creating a slowly increasing number of  antagonistic public comments and complaints.  Immigration Minister Chris Evans understandably points to the deteriorating position in parts of Afghanistan and Pakistan as a factor, as well as noting a “second supply chain” from Sri Lanka.

It is an unfortunate sign of how easily our priorities and perspective can be distorted. The arrival of a few hundred Sri Lankan asylum seekers is seen by some as a serious problem, even though those assessed as not being refugees are being returned.

Yet the Sri Lankan government continues to detain over a quarter of a million men, women and children in over-crowded, unsafe internment camps with barely a concern being voiced.  This piece by Jeff Sparrow notes that the silence about this situation extends to most other western countries too.  The piece also contains some descriptions from The Guardian and elsewhere about the awful conditions in the camps and other human rights breaches.

Human Rights Watch has done their usual thorough job of detailing the situation facing hundreds of thousands of displaced people.

Since March 2008, the Sri Lankan government has confined virtually everyone displaced by the war between the government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) to detention camps, depriving them of their liberty and freedom of movement in violation of international law. As of September 15, 2009, the government was holding 264,583 internally displaced persons in detention camps and hospitals, according to the UN, while fewer than 12,000 have been released or returned home.

Human Rights Watch also list specific problems such as:

Arbitrary detention and enforced disappearance;

Inability to trace missing relatives: The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), which often traces family members, has been barred from the main camps since mid-July);

Lack of protection mechanisms in the camps: The military camp administration is preventing humanitarian organizations, including the UN and the ICRC, from undertaking effective monitoring and protection in the camps;

Conditions in the camps and expected deterioration during the monsoon;

Lack of access to proper medical care

Lack of transparency and information.

But it seems the prospect of a few hundred Sri Lankans arriving in Australia by boat, some of whom are undoubtedly fleeing this situation, is a much bigger problem than the human rights abuses being inflicted on as thousand times as many people in the place they have left.

As Jeff Sparrow said in noting the minimal concern being expressed internationally:

That’s why the situation in Sri Lanka matters so much. It’s not simply because there’s something fundamentally wrong about mass collective punishment. It’s because if the world doesn’t speak out, you can expect see the model put into action elsewhere.

Advertisements
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: